0:00:00.501,0:00:02.508 CATHY LEWIS: How do you answer skeptics? 0:00:02.508,0:00:04.111 Because I'm sure that they still come to you 0:00:04.111,0:00:06.322 and say "I'm sorry, I [inaudible] it." 0:00:06.322,0:00:07.523 How do you answer that? 0:00:07.523,0:00:10.423 ADM. DAVID TITLEY: I mean, what I do is 0:00:10.423,0:00:14.072 I kind of go through in a, thank God, more abbreviated version 0:00:14.072,0:00:16.780 than what I did this evening, 0:00:16.780,0:00:19.043 but basically just try to walk through the physics 0:00:19.043,0:00:22.779 because-- at a very basic, conceptual level, 0:00:22.779,0:00:25.571 no equations, no nothing like that. 0:00:25.571,0:00:28.526 Because we know the climate's changing. 0:00:28.526,0:00:31.033 I mean, there's just too much data for us. 0:00:31.033,0:00:34.830 And again, I kind of go back to my time on that ship that I showed you, 0:00:34.830,0:00:36.133 USS Farragut. 0:00:36.133,0:00:38.322 I was privileged to be the navigator, 0:00:38.322,0:00:39.743 which is a really, really cool job, 0:00:39.743,0:00:41.535 because you're the only junior officer that can 0:00:41.535,0:00:42.986 tell the captain where to go. 0:00:42.986,0:00:44.824 So that's actually kind of fun. 0:00:44.824,0:00:48.033 But one of the things you learn as a navigator-- 0:00:48.033,0:00:48.953 if you don't learn it, 0:00:48.953,0:00:51.200 you're probably not going to be one very long-- 0:00:51.200,0:00:55.921 is you never trust any one individual data point. 0:00:55.921,0:00:58.629 So, you know, I kind of look at climate change like that. 0:00:58.629,0:01:00.467 If it was just the Arctic, 0:01:00.467,0:01:03.164 but all the glaciers were like, you know, being the same 0:01:03.164,0:01:05.855 or coming down, and there were no temperature changes, 0:01:05.855,0:01:10.495 there was no acidification change in the ocean, well, OK, 0:01:10.495,0:01:12.033 we've probably got to look at something else. 0:01:12.033,0:01:14.188 But when you look at all the data, 0:01:14.188,0:01:16.311 it all lines up with a consistent picture. 0:01:16.311,0:01:17.682 You can actually model it, 0:01:17.682,0:01:19.821 you take out the carbon dioxide, you don't get the right answer; 0:01:19.821,0:01:23.698 you put in the CO2, you get the right answer. 0:01:23.698,0:01:25.682 So you can kind of go through that 0:01:25.682,0:01:27.824 and I just gave one example of, 0:01:27.824,0:01:30.083 you know, when skeptics have a question about, 0:01:30.083,0:01:31.167 what's a trace gas. 0:01:31.167,0:01:32.761 And I hear that all the time. 0:01:32.761,0:01:34.495 Well, hey, alcohol's a trace, 0:01:34.495,0:01:36.104 but we sure hear about that. 0:01:36.104,0:01:38.090 So just because it's a trace, 0:01:38.090,0:01:39.161 it's interesting, 0:01:39.161,0:01:42.792 but it doesn't mean that it cannot be effective. 0:01:42.792,0:01:45.300 So what I've found is 0:01:45.300,0:01:49.904 that people who really, really, really believe it's all a vast conspiracy theory, 0:01:49.904,0:01:51.609 there's not much you can say. 0:01:51.609,0:01:52.578 But I would say-- 0:01:52.578,0:01:56.428 and again, could I just get a show of hands of whose been in the military? 0:01:56.428,0:01:57.864 OK, so a bunch. 0:01:57.864,0:02:01.260 So you guys and gals will probably sort of understand this. 0:02:01.260,0:02:02.854 You know in the military we have some 0:02:02.854,0:02:05.915 very, very, very sensitive programs 0:02:05.915,0:02:08.188 and you read people in, 0:02:08.188,0:02:11.448 make them take polygraphs half the time, 0:02:11.448,0:02:15.575 you are told to never, ever, ever talk about them. 0:02:15.575,0:02:17.509 If you do, we will humiliate you, 0:02:17.509,0:02:18.684 we will take you to jail, 0:02:18.684,0:02:20.669 we will take away your job. 0:02:20.669,0:02:24.118 Even then, it's pretty hard to keep a secret. Right? 0:02:24.118,0:02:26.024 It's pretty hard to keep a secret. 0:02:26.024,0:02:27.513 So what I sometimes want to know, 0:02:27.513,0:02:29.179 when I hear these conspiracy theories 0:02:29.179,0:02:33.443 is how do you get about 3,000 academics across the world 0:02:33.443,0:02:34.749 who like to talk, 0:02:34.749,0:02:36.604 who (oh, by the way) if they could really disprove this, 0:02:36.604,0:02:39.660 there's probably a Nobel Prize in it for somebody. 0:02:39.660,0:02:40.496 You know, how--how-- 0:02:40.496,0:02:42.691 do they all like sign an oath or something 0:02:42.691,0:02:43.997 that they were all going to say this? 0:02:43.997,0:02:45.747 I mean, we've got a hard time in the Navy 0:02:45.747,0:02:48.438 to try and keep some. 0:02:48.438,0:02:49.509 It's a challenge. 0:02:49.509,0:02:52.176 So are you telling me a bunch of academics 0:02:52.176,0:02:54.215 who like to talk are going to...you know... 0:02:54.215,0:02:55.935 it just doesn't pass the sense. 0:02:55.935,0:02:59.096 You know, there are some people you just aren't going to convince. 0:02:59.096,0:03:02.753 But then, you know, that's OK. 0:03:02.753,0:03:04.143 LEWIS: So I guess the issue would be then, 0:03:04.143,0:03:05.981 and I think you were talking about this a little earlier, 0:03:05.981,0:03:08.689 there will be a percentage of people who will believe you no matter what, 0:03:08.689,0:03:11.998 a percentage of people who will disbelieve you no matter what, 0:03:11.998,0:03:15.109 so the battle is for what's in the middle. 0:03:15.109,0:03:16.711 ADM. TITLEY: [inaudible] of the New York Times 0:03:16.711,0:03:19.285 really writes about this, the so-called six people. 0:03:19.285,0:03:21.378 And yeah, people on either end are there, 0:03:21.378,0:03:24.131 and the people in the middle slosh around, 0:03:24.131,0:03:26.772 and they'll, you know, I really think, 0:03:26.772,0:03:29.446 I'm pretty optimistic, people listen to reason. 0:03:29.446,0:03:31.251 If you can make a well-reasoned case, 0:03:31.251,0:03:34.895 you know, giving somebody just a spreadsheet or whatever 0:03:34.895,0:03:36.738 or one picture of a [inaudible] 0:03:36.738,0:03:38.514 probably doesn't do much, but 0:03:38.514,0:03:40.076 you know, it's sort of building the first principles. 0:03:40.076,0:03:43.765 I think, you look at all the data. 0:03:43.765,0:03:46.926 As I said, I didn't start off really believing much of this. 0:03:46.926,0:03:47.797 but as you look at it, 0:03:47.797,0:03:50.165 I mean, you've got to kind of come to a conclusion. 0:03:50.165,0:03:51.523 So it's what Churchill said, 0:03:51.523,0:03:52.677 can you, when you see the truth, 0:03:52.677,9:59:59.000 can you, can you kind of change your own--