1 00:00:00,501 --> 00:00:02,508 CATHY LEWIS: How do you answer skeptics? 2 00:00:02,508 --> 00:00:04,111 Because I'm sure that they still come to you 3 00:00:04,111 --> 00:00:06,322 and say "I'm sorry, I [inaudible] it." 4 00:00:06,322 --> 00:00:07,523 How do you answer that? 5 00:00:07,523 --> 00:00:10,423 ADM. DAVID TITLEY: I mean, what I do is 6 00:00:10,423 --> 00:00:14,072 I kind of go through in a, thank God, more abbreviated version 7 00:00:14,072 --> 00:00:16,780 than what I did this evening, 8 00:00:16,780 --> 00:00:19,043 but basically just try to walk through the physics 9 00:00:19,043 --> 00:00:22,779 because-- at a very basic, conceptual level, 10 00:00:22,779 --> 00:00:25,571 no equations, no nothing like that. 11 00:00:25,571 --> 00:00:28,526 Because we know the climate's changing. 12 00:00:28,526 --> 00:00:31,033 I mean, there's just too much data for us. 13 00:00:31,033 --> 00:00:34,830 And again, I kind of go back to my time on that ship that I showed you, 14 00:00:34,830 --> 00:00:36,133 USS Farragut. 15 00:00:36,133 --> 00:00:38,322 I was privileged to be the navigator, 16 00:00:38,322 --> 00:00:39,743 which is a really, really cool job, 17 00:00:39,743 --> 00:00:41,535 because you're the only junior officer that can 18 00:00:41,535 --> 00:00:42,986 tell the captain where to go. 19 00:00:42,986 --> 00:00:44,824 So that's actually kind of fun. 20 00:00:44,824 --> 00:00:48,033 But one of the things you learn as a navigator-- 21 00:00:48,033 --> 00:00:48,953 if you don't learn it, 22 00:00:48,953 --> 00:00:51,200 you're probably not going to be one very long-- 23 00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:55,921 is you never trust any one individual data point. 24 00:00:55,921 --> 00:00:58,629 So, you know, I kind of look at climate change like that. 25 00:00:58,629 --> 00:01:00,467 If it was just the Arctic, 26 00:01:00,467 --> 00:01:03,164 but all the glaciers were like, you know, being the same 27 00:01:03,164 --> 00:01:05,855 or coming down, and there were no temperature changes, 28 00:01:05,855 --> 00:01:10,495 there was no acidification change in the ocean, well, OK, 29 00:01:10,495 --> 00:01:12,033 we've probably got to look at something else. 30 00:01:12,033 --> 00:01:14,188 But when you look at all the data, 31 00:01:14,188 --> 00:01:16,311 it all lines up with a consistent picture. 32 00:01:16,311 --> 00:01:17,682 You can actually model it, 33 00:01:17,682 --> 00:01:19,821 you take out the carbon dioxide, you don't get the right answer; 34 00:01:19,821 --> 00:01:23,698 you put in the CO2, you get the right answer. 35 00:01:23,698 --> 00:01:25,682 So you can kind of go through that 36 00:01:25,682 --> 00:01:27,824 and I just gave one example of, 37 00:01:27,824 --> 00:01:30,083 you know, when skeptics have a question about, 38 00:01:30,083 --> 00:01:31,167 what's a trace gas. 39 00:01:31,167 --> 00:01:32,761 And I hear that all the time. 40 00:01:32,761 --> 00:01:34,495 Well, hey, alcohol's a trace, 41 00:01:34,495 --> 00:01:36,104 but we sure hear about that. 42 00:01:36,104 --> 00:01:38,090 So just because it's a trace, 43 00:01:38,090 --> 00:01:39,161 it's interesting, 44 00:01:39,161 --> 00:01:42,792 but it doesn't mean that it cannot be effective. 45 00:01:42,792 --> 00:01:45,300 So what I've found is 46 00:01:45,300 --> 00:01:49,904 that people who really, really, really believe it's all a vast conspiracy theory, 47 00:01:49,904 --> 00:01:51,609 there's not much you can say. 48 00:01:51,609 --> 00:01:52,578 But I would say-- 49 00:01:52,578 --> 00:01:56,428 and again, could I just get a show of hands of whose been in the military? 50 00:01:56,428 --> 00:01:57,864 OK, so a bunch. 51 00:01:57,864 --> 00:02:01,260 So you guys and gals will probably sort of understand this. 52 00:02:01,260 --> 00:02:02,854 You know in the military we have some 53 00:02:02,854 --> 00:02:05,915 very, very, very sensitive programs 54 00:02:05,915 --> 00:02:08,188 and you read people in, 55 00:02:08,188 --> 00:02:11,448 make them take polygraphs half the time, 56 00:02:11,448 --> 00:02:15,575 you are told to never, ever, ever talk about them. 57 00:02:15,575 --> 00:02:17,509 If you do, we will humiliate you, 58 00:02:17,509 --> 00:02:18,684 we will take you to jail, 59 00:02:18,684 --> 00:02:20,669 we will take away your job. 60 00:02:20,669 --> 00:02:24,118 Even then, it's pretty hard to keep a secret. Right? 61 00:02:24,118 --> 00:02:26,024 It's pretty hard to keep a secret. 62 00:02:26,024 --> 00:02:27,513 So what I sometimes want to know, 63 00:02:27,513 --> 00:02:29,179 when I hear these conspiracy theories 64 00:02:29,179 --> 00:02:33,443 is how do you get about 3,000 academics across the world 65 00:02:33,443 --> 00:02:34,749 who like to talk, 66 00:02:34,749 --> 00:02:36,604 who (oh, by the way) if they could really disprove this, 67 00:02:36,604 --> 00:02:39,660 there's probably a Nobel Prize in it for somebody. 68 00:02:39,660 --> 00:02:40,496 You know, how--how-- 69 00:02:40,496 --> 00:02:42,691 do they all like sign an oath or something 70 00:02:42,691 --> 00:02:43,997 that they were all going to say this? 71 00:02:43,997 --> 00:02:45,747 I mean, we've got a hard time in the Navy 72 00:02:45,747 --> 00:02:48,438 to try and keep some. 73 00:02:48,438 --> 00:02:49,509 It's a challenge. 74 00:02:49,509 --> 00:02:52,176 So are you telling me a bunch of academics 75 00:02:52,176 --> 00:02:54,215 who like to talk are going to...you know... 76 00:02:54,215 --> 00:02:55,935 it just doesn't pass the sense. 77 00:02:55,935 --> 00:02:59,096 You know, there are some people you just aren't going to convince. 78 00:02:59,096 --> 00:03:02,753 But then, you know, that's OK. 79 00:03:02,753 --> 00:03:04,143 LEWIS: So I guess the issue would be then, 80 00:03:04,143 --> 00:03:05,981 and I think you were talking about this a little earlier, 81 00:03:05,981 --> 00:03:08,689 there will be a percentage of people who will believe you no matter what, 82 00:03:08,689 --> 00:03:11,998 a percentage of people who will disbelieve you no matter what, 83 00:03:11,998 --> 00:03:15,109 so the battle is for what's in the middle. 84 00:03:15,109 --> 00:03:16,711 ADM. TITLEY: [inaudible] of the New York Times 85 00:03:16,711 --> 00:03:19,285 really writes about this, the so-called six people. 86 00:03:19,285 --> 00:03:21,378 And yeah, people on either end are there, 87 00:03:21,378 --> 00:03:24,131 and the people in the middle slosh around, 88 00:03:24,131 --> 00:03:26,772 and they'll, you know, I really think, 89 00:03:26,772 --> 00:03:29,446 I'm pretty optimistic, people listen to reason. 90 00:03:29,446 --> 00:03:31,251 If you can make a well-reasoned case, 91 00:03:31,251 --> 00:03:34,895 you know, giving somebody just a spreadsheet or whatever 92 00:03:34,895 --> 00:03:36,738 or one picture of a [inaudible] 93 00:03:36,738 --> 00:03:38,514 probably doesn't do much, but 94 00:03:38,514 --> 00:03:40,076 you know, it's sort of building the first principles. 95 00:03:40,076 --> 00:03:43,765 I think, you look at all the data. 96 00:03:43,765 --> 00:03:46,926 As I said, I didn't start off really believing much of this. 97 00:03:46,926 --> 00:03:47,797 but as you look at it, 98 00:03:47,797 --> 00:03:50,165 I mean, you've got to kind of come to a conclusion. 99 00:03:50,165 --> 00:03:51,523 So it's what Churchill said, 100 00:03:51,523 --> 00:03:52,677 can you, when you see the truth, 101 00:03:52,677 --> 99:59:59,999 can you, can you kind of change your own--