1
00:00:00,988 --> 00:00:05,611
And isn't it ironic, don't you think?

2
00:00:06,707 --> 00:00:09,877
Have you noticed this strange trend in TV commercial recently?

3
00:00:09,877 --> 00:00:12,946
It's been bothering me for awhile but I haven't quite been able to put a name to it.

4
00:00:12,946 --> 00:00:16,550
It's this kinda twisted combination of cynicism and humour

5
00:00:16,550 --> 00:00:21,255
with these over the top caricatures and it always ends up being racist and/or sexist.

6
00:00:21,255 --> 00:00:24,298
It's really the normalizations of sexism through the use of irony.

7
00:00:24,298 --> 00:00:28,061
It's the 'they know that I know that they know that their being sexist'

8
00:00:28,061 --> 00:00:32,633
Some terms people have used to describe this is ironic sexism or retro sexism.

9
00:00:32,633 --> 00:00:36,537
Retro Sexism is modern attitudes and behaviors that mimic or glorify sexist aspects

10
00:00:36,537 --> 00:00:39,840
of the past, often in an ironic way.

11
00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:41,706
Let's see an example from Carl's Jr.

12
00:00:48,587 --> 00:00:53,086
I know it's over the top and ridiculous to see women marching in American flags to

13
00:00:53,086 --> 00:00:57,491
Liberty, Cheeseburgers and the American Dream, and they know that they are

14
00:00:57,491 --> 00:01:01,828
over the top and ridiculous and objectifying women but because we all know

15
00:01:01,828 --> 00:01:03,706
doesn't mean that it's not sexist.

16
00:01:03,706 --> 00:01:06,663
Take for example this new marketing campaign by Mike's Hard Lemonade,

17
00:01:06,663 --> 00:01:09,403
where they are attempting to rebrand their product as a more

18
00:01:09,403 --> 00:01:11,864
"manly" drink and a less "girly" drink.

19
00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:14,260
"Can you believe some guys have never tried Mike's Hard Lemonade because

20
00:01:14,290 --> 00:01:15,943
they've seen women drink it?"

21
00:01:15,943 --> 00:01:18,716
"We don't have those kinds of issues"

22
00:01:19,240 --> 00:01:20,250
"Thank you"

23
00:01:20,250 --> 00:01:21,281
"No we don't"

24
00:01:21,281 --> 00:01:24,751
"Mike's is a refreshing change of pace to beer but you should enjoy it responsibly"

25
00:01:24,751 --> 00:01:28,055
"For example, do you have a designated driver? I could take you home"

26
00:01:28,055 --> 00:01:29,489
"Or I could"

27
00:01:29,489 --> 00:01:32,459
"Or I could take you both home... Lots of options"

28
00:01:32,459 --> 00:01:35,963
See how he's not even pretending to fool us? Like we're all in on this big joke,

29
00:01:35,963 --> 00:01:40,267
look how funny it is that he's incompetently and obviously trying to take advantage

30
00:01:40,267 --> 00:01:43,604
of these women. We're all supposed to know that he's acting like a scum bag

31
00:01:43,604 --> 00:01:45,672
and ha ha isn't it funny.

32
00:01:45,672 --> 00:01:49,776
Really, they know that I know that they know that their being sexist.

33
00:01:51,038 --> 00:01:55,048
Or what about the good old wandering eyed lying husband and naive wife tropes?

34
00:01:55,048 --> 00:01:56,917
"Do you have the extra pacifier?" "Yes"

35
00:01:56,917 --> 00:01:58,285
"Do we have enough formula?" "Yes"

36
00:01:58,285 --> 00:02:02,967
"Okay here ya go honey... honey... honey"

37
00:02:04,782 --> 00:02:07,427
"What are you looking at?"

38
00:02:07,427 --> 00:02:13,567
"Need a moment, try the chocolate caramel and fresh cookie crunch of Twix."

39
00:02:13,567 --> 00:02:18,130
"I'm looking at potential babysitters so we could spend more time together"

40
00:02:18,130 --> 00:02:19,884
"Aw that's so sweet"

41
00:02:19,884 --> 00:02:21,731
"When you need a moment, chew it over with Twix"

42
00:02:21,747 --> 00:02:25,579
See how obviously and transparently he's lying to his wife. We all recognize that this is

43
00:02:25,579 --> 00:02:29,316
ridiculous. This guy is clearly being a jerk and we get to laugh at that

44
00:02:29,316 --> 00:02:33,287
but we have the added bonus of being able to laugh at his naive wife who is clearly

45
00:02:33,287 --> 00:02:35,622
not seeing his transparent behaviour.

46
00:02:35,622 --> 00:02:39,193
Additionally, the advertisers get to use pseudo porn stars in a male fantasy

47
00:02:39,193 --> 00:02:42,429
sequence so the audience gets to join the man in oogling the women.

48
00:02:42,429 --> 00:02:45,090
And for another example of the naive girlfriend.

49
00:02:46,567 --> 00:02:48,836
"Who could that be?"

50
00:02:48,836 --> 00:02:55,309
"Oh wow, I'm there for you buddy. That was Brad. He really wants to... vent."

51
00:02:55,309 --> 00:02:57,244
"You should go."

52
00:02:58,736 --> 00:03:02,673
"Ready to vent?" "Let's vent" "Let's vent!" "Let's vent!!"

53
00:03:02,673 --> 00:03:05,455
"Introducing the vented widemouth can from Coor's Light.

54
00:03:05,455 --> 00:03:08,589
It let's in air for a smooth refreshing pour."

55
00:03:08,589 --> 00:03:11,558
"Is he okay?" "I think we'll be venting a little longer."

56
00:03:12,373 --> 00:03:15,329
So you see they know that I know that they know.

57
00:03:15,329 --> 00:03:19,299
Women are supposed to laugh at how stupid this girlfriend is while being secure in the

58
00:03:19,299 --> 00:03:22,469
knowledge that they'll never make the same mistake. This commercial is set up so that

59
00:03:22,469 --> 00:03:26,673
women are laughing at caricatured sexist representations of other women.

60
00:03:26,673 --> 00:03:30,544
Ariel Levy describes in her fantastic book "Female Chauvinist Pigs" how women are

61
00:03:30,544 --> 00:03:34,982
being trained to be just as raunchy and objectify women just like "one of the guys".

62
00:03:34,982 --> 00:03:38,118
We're coerced into doing this instead of aligning ourselves with one another.

63
00:03:38,118 --> 00:03:42,155
One of the reasons might be to impress men and I'm gonna guess that

64
00:03:42,155 --> 00:03:45,058
pointing out sexism isn't exactly popular with the guys.

65
00:03:45,058 --> 00:03:48,862
This next one not only manages to be sexist but also racist at the same time.

66
00:03:48,862 --> 00:03:50,957
Is there a CLIO award for that?

67
00:04:01,008 --> 00:04:06,847
“When a guy can’t get his wanine to put some hallakahiki all over his morabo

68
00:04:11,278 --> 00:04:13,253
then he’s gotta go some place else.”

69
00:04:13,253 --> 00:04:18,525
Not only is this exotifying and sexualizing Hawaiian culture but she's literally a thing.

70
00:04:18,525 --> 00:04:20,977
This brings a whole new meaning to objectifying.

71
00:04:20,977 --> 00:04:26,200
Carl's Jr. is infamous for uber ironic sexism in their commercials. Remember this one?

72
00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:33,207
“...in the winter when it drizzles, I love Paris in the summer when it sizzles.”

73
00:04:33,207 --> 00:04:37,377
Yet somehow women aren't up in arms, they aren't organizing protests

74
00:04:37,377 --> 00:04:39,913
and boycotts and online campaigns.

75
00:04:39,913 --> 00:04:43,862
Some people might try to defend these ads by saying they are "making fun of sexism"

76
00:04:43,862 --> 00:04:46,053
ironically... somehow...

77
00:04:46,053 --> 00:04:49,323
Advertisers must believe that the use of irony distances themselves from

78
00:04:49,323 --> 00:04:51,024
male chauvinism but that isn't the case.

79
00:04:51,024 --> 00:04:55,283
While we think we are in on the joke, the reality is they aren't making fun of

80
00:04:55,283 --> 00:04:57,931
or pointing out sexism, they're DOING it.

81
00:04:57,931 --> 00:05:01,313
Remember advertisers have one goal and one goal only and that's to sell you a product.

82
00:05:01,313 --> 00:05:06,273
Everything else, all the jokes and humour and imagery and everything else

83
00:05:06,273 --> 00:05:10,744
is to get you to buy it. The easiest way to do this is to use sexist representations

84
00:05:10,744 --> 00:05:13,647
that replicate the status quo and doesn't challenge anything.

85
00:05:13,647 --> 00:05:17,778
Marketers love the uber ironic sexist style of advertising because they can use all the

86
00:05:17,778 --> 00:05:21,188
racist, sexist, misogynist imagery they want and simultaneously distance

87
00:05:21,188 --> 00:05:24,224
themselves from it with a little wink and a nod.

88
00:05:24,224 --> 00:05:27,127
So how many examples of retro sexism have you already seen today?

89
00:05:28,296 --> 00:05:31,877
And isn't it ironic, don't you think?