-
Not Synced
It’s a great pleasure to be here.
-
Not Synced
I want to thank the organisers particularly for allowing me to compete with your cocktails.
-
Not Synced
I guess that given that situation at the end of a long day,
-
Not Synced
the best I can do is talk about something completely different,
-
Not Synced
so I’m going to talk about freedom.
-
Not Synced
I didn’t hear it mentioned much today.
-
Not Synced
So perhaps it represents a useful change of subject.
-
Not Synced
The purpose of the software which everybody has been talking about,
-
Not Synced
seen by most of the people who made it,
-
Not Synced
was to create freedom.
-
Not Synced
It was the consequence of the existence of the free software movement,
-
Not Synced
Fossil,
-
Not Synced
apparently,
-
Not Synced
if you have been listening to today’s proceedings,
-
Not Synced
but naturally,
-
Not Synced
I think,
-
Not Synced
a more or less living organism.
-
Not Synced
The free software movement is a conspiracy to save the 21st century from itself,
-
Not Synced
generated in the last quarter of the 20th century by a series of people who worried about the nature of technology free of ethical and social imperatives for the securing of liberty.
-
Not Synced
The purpose of the software movement can be defined fairly simply as follows: make technology that supports freedom through sharing,
-
Not Synced
put that software in everything,
-
Not Synced
turn freedom on.
-
Not Synced
So far we have completed stage one of that process.
-
Not Synced
The software intended to support freedom now runs everywhere.
-
Not Synced
When I was a young programmer in the 1970s,
-
Not Synced
software engineering had a single over-arching goal,
-
Not Synced
which was summed in a short phrase – Write Once,
-
Not Synced
Run Everywhere.
-
Not Synced
Nobody did it.
-
Not Synced
We did it.
-
Not Synced
Freedom now runs everything from the smallest object in your pocket to the largest cluster of computers in the world,
-
Not Synced
whichever one you’re talking about.
-
Not Synced
Indeed,
-
Not Synced
neither the stuff in your pocket nor the largest computers in the world can run on anything else reliably and with the kind of portability of software that was the goal of software engineering when I was young.
-
Not Synced
We achieved ‘Write Once,
-
Not Synced
Run Everywhere’ because we were tightly focussed on a single goal: make software that supports freedom,
-
Not Synced
put that software in everything,
-
Not Synced
turn freedom on.
-
Not Synced
Now,
-
Not Synced
we have achieved,
-
Not Synced
as I say,
-
Not Synced
the goal of stage one.
-
Not Synced
We have built software that supports freedom.
-
Not Synced
It sustains freedom in several important respects.
-
Not Synced
First,
-
Not Synced
it supports sharing.
-
Not Synced
We used that support for sharing,
-
Not Synced
predominantly the GNU General Public License and other arrangements that protected freedom to share,
-
Not Synced
we used that social and legal technology to destroy a malevolent monopoly whose intention was precisely the opposite: put unfreedom everywhere,
-
Not Synced
charge royalties.
-
Not Synced
That monopoly is now failing and will soon be gone.
-
Not Synced
That’s happening because freedom runs everywhere and is available to anyone who wants it at no cost to copy,
-
Not Synced
modify and improve.
-
Not Synced
That process protects itself against appropriation,
-
Not Synced
it protects itself against unfreedom manufacture out of free parts,
-
Not Synced
and it does what it can to prevent the rent-seeking buried in the patent system by people who unwisely applied the patent system to software in order to enable rent-seeking.
-
Not Synced
However,
-
Not Synced
we have in the process created a network whose possibilities for freedom are as difficult and as threatening as the problems in the network we are seeking to prevent.
-
Not Synced
We have created a platform which allows free culture.
-
Not Synced
Wikipedia exists.
-
Not Synced
Creative Commons exists.
-
Not Synced
Sharing knowledge is now possible all the way to the bottom of opportunity levels in every human society because the mobile telephone is there,
-
Not Synced
and were it not for the rules of so called intellectual property we could deliver every piece of knowledge,
-
Not Synced
every kind of art,
-
Not Synced
everything of human value to every human brain.
-
Not Synced
-
Not Synced
In the next generation we will make a determined attempt to prevent every human brain on the planet from being starved of the knowledge that it seeks to acquire.
-
Not Synced
If we succeed we will change the destiny of the human race,
-
Not Synced
as we always intended to do.
-
Not Synced
But we face a very significant problem,
-
Not Synced
one we knew would develop over time but which has developed faster and in a more threatening fashion than we expected,
-
Not Synced
and it’s built of our parts.
-
Not Synced
You now live in a network which surveils you more deeply,
-
Not Synced
which knows more about you and which renders this knowledge about you more dangerously accessible to those who wish to modify your behaviour than any one of the 20th century political systems we refer to as totalitarian.
-
Not Synced
Those systems could only surveil and observe your behaviour,
-
Not Synced
and they could only do so to the extent that your behaviour was accessible to other human beings who informed on you.
-
Not Synced
The network now knows your thoughts,
-
Not Synced
your plans,
-
Not Synced
your questions,
-
Not Synced
your dreams,
-
Not Synced
your fears,
-
Not Synced
your uncertainties.
-
Not Synced
It surveils every party you go to,
-
Not Synced
every drink you have,
-
Not Synced
every message you leave for a friend.
-
Not Synced
Five hundred million human beings have decided to allow everything they do
-
Not Synced
in their social lives from day to day
-
Not Synced
to be collected in one big database,
-
Not Synced
-
Not Synced
run for profit,
-
Not Synced
by a fool.
-
Not Synced
If we were to allow that situation to continue for much longer,
-
Not Synced
-
Not Synced
we would face a situation in which the very fundamental texture of human autonomy
-
Not Synced
would begin to be adjusted by the network.
-
Not Synced
What you search for,
-
Not Synced
what you find,
-
Not Synced
what you buy,
-
Not Synced
when you decide to want something
-
Not Synced
and what something you decide to want,
-
Not Synced
would begin to be subtly reshaped by machines
-
Not Synced
operating at the direction of those who wish to take economic rents out of the modifiability of your behaviour.
-
Not Synced
Not to mention all the governments which can now with a ‘subpoena blank’
-
Not Synced
or an administrative order of some kind seek from every third party
-
Not Synced
who collects information about you,
-
Not Synced
the information they require
-
Not Synced
in order to interfere with,
-
Not Synced
adjust or forbid your activity.
-
Not Synced
I don’t need to explain to anyone living in France
-
Not Synced
how power hungry the establishment can become on those subjects.
-
Not Synced
Now we come to the unfortunate technical reality described this cloudy name ‘The Cloud’.
-
Not Synced
The funny thing about the cloud is that people talk about it everywhere I go
-
Not Synced
but if you ask them to explain what it is they can’t do it because they don’t know.
-
Not Synced
So I’m going to explain in I hope two fairly simple conceptions what the cloud is.
-
Not Synced
First,
-
Not Synced
the cloud is the sever-client architecture of the net on steroids.
-
Not Synced
And second,
-
Not Synced
the cloud is the server-client architecture on the net on steroids virtualised.
-
Not Synced
The first part of it comes down to this; the internet was constructed by researchers
-
Not Synced
attempting to complete the task of architecturing an entirely de-centralised network
-
Not Synced
of arbitrary geometry to survive arbitrary interferences by minor annoyances like nuclear war,
-
Not Synced
-
Not Synced
by routing all traffic in a completely non hierarchical fashion
-
Not Synced
without any regulation by masters over servants.
-
Not Synced
This was reflected in the very form in which the network understood
-
Not Synced
at its beginning the concept of a server and a client.
-
Not Synced
Those of you who are accustomed to using software produced by the dying monopoly
-
Not Synced
may not understand,
-
Not Synced
but anyone who uses free software,
-
Not Synced
at least passively,
-
Not Synced
-
Not Synced
will understand it,
-
Not Synced
because your free software computer
-
Not Synced
treats the server as the computer closest to you,
-
Not Synced
and the task of that server is to serve human interaction.
-
Not Synced
That’s how X Windows worked,
-
Not Synced
right?
-
Not Synced
The X server serves to processes in the network,
-
Not Synced
-
Not Synced
all of which are assumed to be equal in hierarchical status,
-
Not Synced
-
Not Synced
the opportunity to communicate with a human being
-
Not Synced
and so it serves the opportunity to get to your eyeballs,
-
Not Synced
your eardrum and your fingertips.
-
Not Synced
In other words,
-
Not Synced
the net consisted of a non-hierarchical collection of processes
-
Not Synced
in which each human being had a server which served interaction with him.
-
Not Synced
The basic technical achievements of the monopoly was to distort all of this completely.
-
Not Synced
Windows was a degenerate version of the structure of the network originally architected by people who did not have the same neurological dysfunctions as the architects of the monopoly.
-
Not Synced
The purpose of the server-client interaction structure in the net became to create hierarchies among machines in which some were servers and most were clients,
-
Not Synced
and human beings used clients to deal with servers which operated with respect to those human beings ‘de haut en bas’.
-
Not Synced
We rebuilt the net over a period of almost twenty years to prefigure this peculiarly hierarchical and status conception of the nature of the net which was never any part of the original architecture but was solely an artifact of the rent-seeking policies of the monopolists.
-
Not Synced
Now,
-
Not Synced
that hierarchical architecture of the net is enabling the gathering of political power in the centre with respect to disempowered endpoints and manufacturers of proprietary software and the architects of proprietary networks absorb,
-
Not Synced
as mother’s milk,
-
Not Synced
the business model opportunities by a hierarchical net with power at the centre and disempowered clients at the edge.
-
Not Synced
Those are the preconditions of the The Cloud,
-
Not Synced
the unfair,
-
Not Synced
inappropriate,
-
Not Synced
architecturally unnecessary,
-
Not Synced
economically anti-competitive architecture given to the net,
-
Not Synced
is the vapour out of which The Cloud condenses.
-
Not Synced
All that is left to make the thing called The Cloud is to remove the relationship between iron and the server.
-
Not Synced
This is accomplished by the uniform adoption of virtualisation layers,
-
Not Synced
many of which we wrote.
-
Not Synced
The virtualisation layers make it possible for hierarchies to use the accumulation of power at the centre ever more efficiently and every more mysteriously with respect to the disempowered client at the edge.
-
Not Synced
Taken to an extreme,
-
Not Synced
the hierarchical network architecture allows the client at the edge to be completely disempowered,
-
Not Synced
it receives what is known as ‘software as its service’,
-
Not Synced
more appropriately,
-
Not Synced
I think,
-
Not Synced
labelled ‘software a disservice’,
-
Not Synced
that is to say you can’t provide any services to the net,
-
Not Synced
all you have is software given to you to execute by some master with a disembodied server somewhere.
-
Not Synced
Moreover,
-
Not Synced
and even more aggressively inappropriately,
-
Not Synced
The Cloud comes to be seen as ‘All your data are belong to us’.
-
Not Synced
The virtualisation of storage implies that the party at the edge of the net no longer exercises control over her own information,
-
Not Synced
which is physically located at an arbitrary place chosen for her by people who run The Cloud.
-
Not Synced
Any legal obligations that may exist with respect to the control or management of her data have thus been subverted.
-
Not Synced
If there are,
-
Not Synced
for example,
-
Not Synced
rules concerning the nature of the regulation of the data in The Cloud in a particular place,
-
Not Synced
data will mysteriously tend to move by means legitimate and illegitimate to locations where those regulations are weaker rather than stronger.
-
Not Synced
The North American economy is slowly shifting from towards an economy based primarily data-mining,
-
Not Synced
which might be thought of exercise of control over data representing the human lives of everyone on earth.
-
Not Synced
This is not a recipe for freedom.
-
Not Synced
This is the biggest and most successful recipe for unfreedom that has ever been devised in the history of human beings.
-
Not Synced
We have come,
-
Not Synced
at the moment we expected it to arrive,
-
Not Synced
we have come to a fateful set of choices.
-
Not Synced
The technology of digital computation,
-
Not Synced
storage and control,
-
Not Synced
now offers us,
-
Not Synced
at one and the same time,
-
Not Synced
the greatest possible opportunity; namely,
-
Not Synced
the elimination of ignorance forever and the power to allow every human brain to learn,
-
Not Synced
and on the other hand,
-
Not Synced
the completion of a structure of social control,
-
Not Synced
more thorough,
-
Not Synced
more complete,
-
Not Synced
more technologically perfect than any that has ever existed in the history of human beings.
-
Not Synced
Dearly beloved,
-
Not Synced
I set before you a choice between life and death.
-
Not Synced
Fortunately the tools are still in our hands.
-
Not Synced
We made this stuff and we can fix the problem.
-
Not Synced
As I’ve already suggested,
-
Not Synced
the primary difficulties we face arise from two bad technical decisions,
-
Not Synced
both of them reversible.
-
Not Synced
In the first place we allowed the conception of the server as a form of centralised power divorced from the human being.
-
Not Synced
It was not there in the original design of the net,
-
Not Synced
it is an artifact of bad software manufactured by people with ill will.
-
Not Synced
We do not have to accept the idea that servers are centralised.
-
Not Synced
If we had an enormous number of cheap,
-
Not Synced
reliable,
-
Not Synced
low-power serving computers running software designed to provide services to others on our behalf,
-
Not Synced
and storing our data in them in safe locations,
-
Not Synced
we would convert a network presently consisting of centralised services into a network consisting of federated services,
-
Not Synced
that is services rendered by people,
-
Not Synced
to people,
-
Not Synced
for people,
-
Not Synced
in a non-hierarchical fashion.
-
Not Synced
Second,
-
Not Synced
we could reverse the virtualisation epidemic,
-
Not Synced
not for the purpose of eliminating virtualisation or for preventing those who own heavy duty hardware from making better use of it,
-
Not Synced
but to prevent the idea that you ought not to have a computer of your own,
-
Not Synced
you ought not to store your data on your own,
-
Not Synced
you ought not to provide services to the world on your own,
-
Not Synced
you ought to be a consumer of the services provided by the net.
-
Not Synced
So do we have such a possibility for reversing the centralisation of the network’s architecture? Yes we do.
-
Not Synced
Already,
-
Not Synced
throughout the hardware environment of the world you will notice the beginnings of the distribution of so-called plug-servers,
-
Not Synced
tiny objects requiring very little power,
-
Not Synced
using low-power,
-
Not Synced
low-speed,
-
Not Synced
but quite muscular little chips mostly made by the arm.
-
Not Synced
You can buy at the moment,
-
Not Synced
at prices indicative of the beginning of the hardware form factors run that is in the neighbourhood of ninety to a hundred and fifty US dollars around the world,
-
Not Synced
objects no larger than a cell phone charger,
-
Not Synced
which contain a fully operational server with a wired-nick wireless,
-
Not Synced
some sataports,
-
Not Synced
some USB,
-
Not Synced
some serial consul attachment possibilities and so on.
-
Not Synced
In other words,
-
Not Synced
a fully featured computer capable of delivering services over the net to anybody who wishes to interact with you.
-
Not Synced
The plug servers,
-
Not Synced
which will soon be cheaper than cellphones when they are made in appropriate quantities,
-
Not Synced
those plug servers,
-
Not Synced
supported by free software,
-
Not Synced
will soon be providing a form of personal,
-
Not Synced
private cloud which reverses the negative social consequences of power concentration in the net.
-
Not Synced
Your data,
-
Not Synced
kept in your home,
-
Not Synced
or your office,
-
Not Synced
securely backed up to the plug servers of your friends,
-
Not Synced
capable of being read by nobody without a search warrant,
-
Not Synced
protecting everything inside your apartment by intrusion detection software which works,
-
Not Synced
providing you free telephone calls over the net through ‘asteros’ (have no idea what this means),
-
Not Synced
allowing your friends in China to climb over the great firewall using proxy servers several billion wide,
-
Not Synced
many too many for the Chinese communist party to interfere with,
-
Not Synced
affording you the opportunity to federate your social life rather than centralise it,
-
Not Synced
moving you painlessly and into a migration off Facebook,
-
Not Synced
Flicker,
-
Not Synced
Twitter and all the other bad things.
-
Not Synced
You don’t lose your friends,
-
Not Synced
you all just leave bit by bit,
-
Not Synced
and as you go you cease to use the centralised servers because you have a direct encrypted channel between yourself and each of your friends.
-
Not Synced
In other words,
-
Not Synced
we begin federating what the bad folks centralise.
-
Not Synced
We do this in machines which are so cheap,
-
Not Synced
so ubiquitous,
-
Not Synced
so low in its power demands that we no longer care about reliable electricity: one of these servers will run on two double A batteries.
-
Not Synced
We will succeed,
-
Not Synced
we will succeed,
-
Not Synced
in providing freedom in a packaged so inexpensive,
-
Not Synced
so reliable,
-
Not Synced
and so thoroughly engineered by us,
-
Not Synced
for us,
-
Not Synced
that it will no longer be possible for people around the network to concentrate power,
-
Not Synced
to concentrate data,
-
Not Synced
or to conduct meaningful surveillance of our individual lives.
-
Not Synced
We will not soon but now.
-
Not Synced
The hardware economics are not a problem for us.
-
Not Synced
They’re already solved.
-
Not Synced
The software economics are not a problem for us.
-
Not Synced
We solved those long ago.
-
Not Synced
The technical problems are not a problem for us.
-
Not Synced
We’re good at that.
-
Not Synced
That’s how we got here.
-
Not Synced
The political questions are not hard for us.
-
Not Synced
We love freedom and we hate tyranny.
-
Not Synced
We know exactly how to tell the difference,
-
Not Synced
no matter whether it wears a hoodie or a space suit or a uniform.
-
Not Synced
We know what we’re doing.
-
Not Synced
We’re going to put freedom in new things.
-
Not Synced
We’re going to spread those things across the planet.
-
Not Synced
We’re going to turn freedom on.
-
Not Synced
So what I want to tell is this: it’s okay,
-
Not Synced
we’re still here,
-
Not Synced
we haven’t gone away,
-
Not Synced
the free software movement isn’t dead,
-
Not Synced
it hasn’t become ‘open’ anything.
-
Not Synced
We know exactly what we need to do and we’re going to do it,
-
Not Synced
we’re going to make it,
-
Not Synced
and we’re going to say ‘Hey.
-
Not Synced
Here.
-
Not Synced
We made this freedom.
-
Not Synced
We think you might like it.
-
Not Synced
Want some? Take it.
-
Not Synced
It’s free.
-
Not Synced
Wanna join up?’ Thank you very much.
-
Not Synced
-
Not Synced
